Course: INT301: Computer Networking
Project: Network Design Proposal for Anthony's Potato Chip Company
Project Type: Enterprise Network Architecture & Infrastructure Design
Final Project Grade: 100%
Project Overview
The Enterprise Network Design project focused on developing a complete network infrastructure proposal for Anthony's Potato Chip Company, a mid-sized organization with approximately 500 employees operating across three Southern California locations.
The company required a modern network capable of connecting its San Diego headquarters, Alpine production and warehouse facility, and Escondido sales office while improving reliability, communication, security, scalability, and centralized network management.
For my solution, I designed a multi-site enterprise architecture incorporating LAN and WAN infrastructure, departmental VLAN segmentation, Layer 3 switching, wireless connectivity, VoIP support, centralized servers, fiber backbone connections, and secure VPN communication between locations.
I also developed detailed network diagrams, individual facility floor plans, an equipment and cost analysis, and a companion infrastructure presentation to visually communicate the proposed solution.
Network Requirements
The network was designed to accommodate several forms of organizational traffic and communication, including:
- Business documents and email
- VoIP and PBX communications
- Video conferencing
- Wireless communications
- Manufacturing system data
- Cloud-based applications
- Centralized file and application services
- Employee workstations and printers
- Network management systems
Multi-Site Network Design
The proposed infrastructure connects three primary company locations.
Alpine Production & Warehouse Facility
Escondido Sales Office
VLAN Segmentation
Departmental VLANs were implemented to logically separate network traffic while allowing departments to share the same physical infrastructure.
The design included:
- VLAN 10: Sales
- VLAN 20: Finance
- VLAN 30: HR
- VLAN 40: IT
- VLAN 50: Voice Communications
- VLAN 60: Management
- VLAN 70: Manufacturing
The WAN infrastructure connects the Alpine manufacturing facility and Escondido sales office to the San Diego headquarters.
I selected secure VPN tunnels across the Internet to provide encrypted communication between locations.
This architecture allows employees at remote facilities to securely access centralized servers, shared resources, cloud applications, and communication systems at headquarters.
VPN connectivity was selected instead of private leased lines because it offered an appropriate balance between security, functionality, and cost for the company's multi-site environment.
Equipment & Cost Analysis
I developed an equipment analysis to estimate the hardware required to implement the proposed network.
The design included:
- Cisco Catalyst 1000 Series switches
- Cisco Aironet 1832i wireless access points
- Cisco ISR 4331 WAN/VPN routers
- Cat6 Ethernet cabling
- Dell PowerEdge T40 servers
Cisco networking equipment was selected to maintain compatibility and consistent management throughout the LAN, VLAN, backbone, and WAN infrastructure.
The proposed hardware investment was approximately:
Estimated Total Network Equipment Cost: $19,900
The equipment was selected based on reliability, scalability, secure connectivity, wireless coverage, centralized management, and the organization's future growth requirements.
Communication & Network Management
The proposal also considered software and services that could support collaboration and network administration across the organization.
Potential solutions included Microsoft Teams or Zoom for meetings and communication, Microsoft Outlook for email and scheduling, cloud-based collaboration through OneDrive or Google Drive, and network monitoring through SolarWinds.
These technologies were considered supporting components of a broader infrastructure designed to connect employees and systems across geographically separated facilities.
Network Models
The proposed infrastructure can be understood through both the 5-layer Internet model and the OSI 7-layer model.
I determined that the 5-layer Internet model most directly represents the practical infrastructure because its layers correspond closely with the physical devices, Ethernet connectivity, IP routing, transport services, and business applications incorporated into the network.
The OSI model also provides useful additional detail for understanding communication sessions, data formatting, encryption, and application services.
As a result, I described the network as being primarily represented by the 5-layer Internet model while also being explainable through the OSI 7-layer model.
Skills Demonstrated
Project Results
View Project
Final Project Grade: 100.00%
Instructor Feedback
Instructor Amine Dehmani provided exceptionally positive feedback on the final network design.
"This network design is robust and well-structured, showcasing a clear grasp of enterprise networking principles, particularly in VLAN segmentation, hierarchical design, and WAN/VPN connectivity."
Instructor Amine Dehmani
He also recognized the requirement analysis and detailed design as comprehensive and technically solid, with well-justified equipment selections.
Most notably, he described the final submission as "one of the best I've seen" and highlighted its technical depth, effective communication, and overall quality.
Reflection
This project significantly strengthened my understanding of how individual networking concepts come together within a complete enterprise infrastructure.
Rather than treating LANs, VLANs, switches, routers, wireless access points, VPNs, and servers as independent technologies, I had to determine how each component would support the organization's actual business operations.
One of the most important improvements I made during the project was transitioning the design from a relatively basic network layout into a hierarchical enterprise architecture using core, distribution, and access layers. I also expanded the design with departmental VLAN segmentation, Layer 3 switching, secure VPN connectivity, and centralized backbone management.
Developing the individual facility diagrams helped me think about network design from both logical and physical perspectives. The infrastructure needed to make sense on a topology diagram, but it also needed to account for where employees, departments, wireless access points, switches, servers, and operational systems would physically exist.
The project ultimately reinforced that enterprise network design is not simply about connecting devices. A strong network architecture must consider business requirements, security, performance, reliability, communication patterns, physical infrastructure, cost, and future organizational growth.
0 comments